Samsung EVO 64GB 48/MB/s Micro SDXC Memory Card with Adapter up to (MB-MP64DA/AM)

I tend to do a very large amount of research before I buy anything tech/electronic wise since I not only find it fun but of course helps me end up with the best product for the money, future proofing to the best I can and also not over spending on features that go used(which in the case of SD and memory cards is a big issue) I now have it in my Samsung Galaxy Note 4, and primarily got it because I stream via ChromeCast/Samsung TV 1080p movies frequently approx 2GB each. I want to free as much space on my internal memory as possible so as to not slow the device down with large movie files like I was doing with the old class 2 16GB card I had. Now as this card totes a Class 10 transfer speed rating that is also UHS-1 compatible....the kicker, if your device supports UHS-1 and by the way no smartphones at the moment do...and unless your using your phone as a professional video camera, recording large HD clips it makes no difference really and this is why UHS-1 support if found mainly on high end video recorders. So the advertising for this card boasts a 48m/s transfer speed that sounds pretty good right? (dont forget this says "with UHS-1")....Yes you see where now one can be confused about the real speeds people will see on their smartphones/tablets, which by the way is probably the majority use now of these cards as one can now add double their 32GB internal memory in one fast SD card for about $30...kind of makes you think how much of a rip off Apple is for charging 100 bucks for each additional 16Gbs or 32Gbs, I mean the physical memory isnt costing them that so what is, memory started becoming dirt cheap about 6 years ago but drones still cling onto their iphones like something called Micro SD cards havent been invented. Oh I forgot they have "the clould" because that is like exactly the same thing as having the data on a memory card in your phone, not dependent on Apples servers or data/internet being used or even present . Anyways enough icrap, this is the EVO version, the mid range model, the PRO being the best but also exponentially more expensive...the EVO was only about 10 or 15 bucks more than the baseline card and is about double the speeds. The PRO version had about double the EVO speeds but I was almost sure those added speeds wouldnt get utilized on my phone...I couldn't find anywhere detailing exactly how fast the Note 4s SD hardware/software was capable of transferring but since the Note 4 is essentially the top of the line phone toting the most up to date processor and other specs I figured that it had to at least transfer Class 10 speeds. So far I am extremely happy with the performance of this card. Besides the plethora of great reviews about this card which makes pulling the trigger way easier on the order. I like the Samsung Samsung paring haha as hey it can't only help right?...BUT now let's get down to real stuff... HOW DID THE CARD ACTUALLY PREFORM WHEN TESTED? (Using the A1 SD Bench app which is a great app to test your phones SD card but also see how other phones on the market, tablets, and their specs stack up against each other) This is an awesome app because the data is all sourced from the very large amount of tests that people who run the app submit for all to see, so the numbers are real world sourced, have a large sample size to null any outliers, and doesn't have a bias towards hyping certain features like advertising does. The card averaged over over 10 tests of the long test mode (recommend standard): 40.95MB/s Read ------ 20.92 MB/s Write So it seems that although the toted 48 mb/s they advertised, with UHS 1 compatible device if you pay attention though...which my Note 4 is not compatible with...still hit consistently at 40/20 read write with the card about 3/4 full of content during testing as to test real life conditions. The Note 4 does appear to support Class 10 transfer speeds on SD cards and this card works great because you are not over spending on anymore than you need, yet your utilizing the cards EVO speeds practically fully when tested in real world conditions.

I have been using this in an LG GPad now for three years without any issues. I wasn't certain that the LG GPad would be compatible with the XC 1 memory but it was not an issue. This is a decent card, though compared with modern options such as the new U3 version of this same card, it falls short in performance. Read speeds were about 42MB/s and writes at 22MB/s. This card works well in my tablet and would do well for most cell phones. Use in cameras should be fine as well as Full HD video. However, performance falls short of the mark needed for recording 4k video. Compared with the Sandisk Extreme http://amzn.to/2tbR1jg The Sandisk Extreme has about 2x read speeds, but write speeds 3x faster than the Samsung Evo, bringing it within range for 4k video recording. The SanDisk is a more expensive card, and worth the price. If your are truly on a budget, and do not need to record 4k video, the Samsung may be acceptable. Compared with Sandisk Extreme Pro XC I http://amzn.to/2sad8b7 The Samsung Evo half as fast as the Extreme Pro in reads, and does compare when it comes to writes speed. The Sandisk Extreme Pro XC I is 4x as fast, though much more expensive. This Sandisk Extreme Pro is more comparable to the new U3 version of the Samsung Evo, a card with a similar price to this one but much better promised performance. Samsung Evo U3 http://amzn.to/2s0xS2t Compared with Sandisk Extreme Pro XC II http://amzn.to/2tb5Ged There is no comparison in performance. The Extreme Pro XC II is rated at 300MB/s vs the 42MB/s read speed for Samsung Evo U1. The read speed difference may be worth the additional money in some situations, but the cost is also about significantly higher. Dumping a large amount of video files off of this card would be a chore. I do recommend removing it from the device for best performance, and using a quality card reader such as. http://amzn.to/2shF9Ou or http://amzn.to/2shRWAz I have attached a benchmark using the Saicoo reader above and a generic USB2 card reader. The transfer rates using the Saicoo show this card to operate at specified rates, about 42MB/s read and 22MB/s write. A good card for the money but definitely a budget card. Even when plugged into a USB 2 port, the Saicoo transferred at 40MB/s, a definite improvement over a bundled generic reader.

put this in my phone and it has been running perfectly for over a year with absolutely zero issues. the transfer speeds are solid and it handles storing photos and videos without any hiccups or slowdowns. for the price you honestly can't ask for more out of a memory card.

Did not receive what was pictured on Amazon, the seller Marcana sent the version without the adapter and stuck an adapter to the outside of the package. Clever. I bring this up because of a popular review on Amazon that described to a tea what had happened to me. The 64GB EVO I purchased the first time had the packaging without the adapter and failed to perform with any more than 8-10GB loaded. In fact it corrupted a ton of files. The seller graciously refunded me and I decided to try Amazon, being sure I ordered the suggested package with adapter. Didn't happen. However, it is working as of this time (3 days), has over 36GB loaded so far and the movies, videos, photo albums, music seem to be functioning normally. I noticed while loading movies from a 3.0 usb external hard drive, they almost flashed into my Lumia1520 phone which uses 2.0 usb to my knowledge. Amazing speed. Unfortunately, the phone ended up needing to be reset to factory settings, leaving the sd card inside, in order to correctly file everything (part of the 8.1 newest update glitch). Or maybe because of that other corrupted or faked EVO 64GB card? So the dinged star rating is for the Amazon seller, not sending what was illustrated, but changing the packaging instead. This card is great, just be cautious of Who you buy it from!

I received this card 24 hours ago; I have used it several times today to backup several Samsung S5 Active cellphones owned by me and family members, and, in short...this card "gets it done fast" for backups of thousands of pix on each of my cell phones. Each phone backed up an average of about 500 JPEG pix (no videos or RAW format)... PER MINUTE... (pix size ranges from ~ 800k to1.4MB) with total pix count between 4,000 and 4,500 from the internal SanDisk microSD to this SAMSUNG 64GB EVO card in a USB reader/writer (without employing the SD adapter). See specs below. Interestingly, last week I backed up the internal SanDisk microSD 64GB ultra XC-1, to an identical SanDisk microSD 64GB ultra XC-1 (purchased at same time, same vendor, same specs, same backup dongle/USB reader/writer)...same phones, same number of pix (+ or minus ~10 pics), same DAY: AND, the speed is, on average for each phone, about 25% SLOWER...details of configurations and specs on microSD cards I used are in following paragraph. PLEASE...Read...Jenny Ramshaw's review about this SAMSUNG 64 EVO card for further "hints" why my real-world backup timings might be better using the SAMSUNG 64 EVO...her review is what prompted me to TRY this SAMSUNG card. I believe she is absolutely correct about speed differences (more than standard read and write speeds) while introducing me to a new microSD spec., IOP speed, between microSD cards; I will be buying two more of this SAMSUNG microSD card by sundown today. SOME KEY DETAILS...Each of my Samsung phones has an internal microSD card slot filled with a SanDisk 64GB ultra XC-1; selected - purchased - and installed by me, in the past three months. To backup each internal SanDisk card in each phone, I use a "real" or logo'd SAMSUNG dongle (~ 8 inches long) , that attaches thru the phones charge port...other end is a USB female port where I attach an Anker USB reader/writer containing this SAMSUNG EVO microSD card. Backing up the TOTAL contents of the internal microSD card, on a SAMSUNG 5S Active, is effortless - very quick to do - and not error prone because of excess inputs; AND, not the case on many other phones, tablets, and other devices...which is the main reason I mention it here. With the SAMSUNG S5 Active phone; the phone automatically "sees" the additional card (no extra software, no clicks, no user action required other than connecting the phone to the dongle with microSD card in card reader) and about 3 seconds after the dongle/reader is attached; the card i.d. appears on the phone screen. Selecting ALL folders on the internal card for backup is a few scribe touches (less than 5), to the screen, even for 50+ folders, and there is no requirement to identify or create new folders (though you can), to begin the backup or move. (In case you were wondering...and I would too, I do not and have not ever been employed by or contracted by SAMSUNG or any of its affiliates worldwide, nor am I being compensated in any way, for my words - written or spoken - in this and any other review or forum, anywhere on the planet. I am a data scientist...not a compensated spokesperson, who is simply trying to help others for all the help I have received from great reviewers on this site.) Mike.

EDIT(03/10/2015): I contacted Samsung (1 (800) SAM-SUNG) and they indicated the representative was able to identify the card as a fake card because it had "Made in Taiwan" printed on the back. He indicated that genuine cards should be have printed on the back "Made in Korea". I called up Amazon and am currently getting a replacement processed. Will update the review when I receive the new card. I purchased this memory card directly from Amazon (Amazon.com LLC) and have been using it for about a month in my Samsung Note 4. I bought this card due to its stellar reviews and Samsung branding which I hoped would work flawlessly with my Samsung phone. During my period of ownership, I attempted to use anywhere from 2-8 GB of the card's capacity primarily consisting of photos and videos. About a week ago, I started noticing a few alarming issues: * Several of the images saved to the card failed to load. New photos taken by the Note 4 would fail to save on the card. No issues saving to the Note 4's internal memory. * I attempted to copy a ~1GB video to the card via my Note 4 attached to a Windows 7 computer by a USB cord. My computer indicated that the video was transferred successfully but my Note 4 was unable to play the video. I ran md5sum on the file on the card and on the same file on my PC and found differences in the md5 hashes. Again, no playback issues when copying directly to the Note 4's internal memory. At this point I made a backup of the data on the card and attempt to format/reinitialize the card again before copying most of the data back onto the card. I copied the data using a USB cable attached to the Note 4, formatted the SD card with the Note 4, then copied most of the data back with the Note 4 (I did not attempt to copy the videos). * I took a few more photos and videos this week without issue until yesterday. Last night, my Note 4 stopped recognizing the card and indicated that the card was corrupted and needed to be formatted. * To eliminate the chance that my Note 4 was the source of the issues, I attached the card to a computer with a known working SDXC card reader and ran some diagnostics. I formatted the card to exFAT and ran H2testw (a program that writes to the card and verifies the validity of the writes). Below are the results: The media is likely to be defective. 4.4 GByte OK (9420032 sectors) 57.9 GByte DATA LOST (121625344 sectors) Details:57.9 GByte overwritten (121625344 sectors) 0 KByte slightly changed (< 8 bit/sector, 0 sectors) 0 KByte corrupted (0 sectors) 4.3 MByte aliased memory (8960 sectors) First error at offset: 0x000000011b7a0000 Expected: 0x000000011b7a0000 Found: 0x000000011f7a0000 H2testw version 1.3 Writing speed: 10.4 MByte/s Reading speed: 16.8 MByte/s H2testw v1.4 For the tech savvy readers, note that the expected value in binary should contain 0x1b (0001 1011) but the value found contained 0x1f (0001 1111). These results also appear to match my usage of the card. The card seemed to work fine until hitting ~4GB. Attempting to copy any more (e.g. a video) would result in errors. On top of losing data, I'm unable to receive a refund because it took me 31 days to determine that the card is defective (one day past the return policy period). I have not yet been able to reach Samsung directly to determine if I can get a replacement card.

It works as expected. Placed in my Samsung Galaxy Note 4, came to something like 59GB or something, which is expected, because of formating. Go out and buy a 6TB hard drive, and your not going to get 6TB, not even close. Just saying. As for the speed, I've upgraded from an old SanDisk Class 4, to this MicroSDXC Class 10 Samsung EVO. I was recording 48Mbps 4K videos with my Note 4, and when it came time to end the video, and the phone would process the videos, it would take FOREVER. So I said let me get a new one, they're pretty cheap nowadays, several months latter, I got one. Why several months latter, because I don't really care about getting a memory card. That's why. I have plenty of money, and I honestly didn't really need one. There's needs, then there's wants. This was a want. I wanted a new card, so I purchased one when I felt like it. It does work much better when processing the 48Mbps 4K videos. When I would record a 10 minute video, it would take like 30 minutes to process. Now it takes about a couple minutes, if that. I was thinking of going with an even faster card, but again, it's a want, and this is fine for what I was looking for. It works. I also use it to make back ups of my apk files, and I also use it to do back ups using TWRP Recovery. Yes, my $700 phone is rooted. I also use it with "not available on Google Play" SCN Recorder Pro 1.0.2, which records the phone, for crap like Clash of clans, etc. etc. Records Internal Audio, and records video at 30Mbps. The quality of my videos is probably better than anyone else sharing they're defense and attack videos on Clash of Clans. Clash of clans is a game, but I've spent at least $150 so far on Gems alone, to get a jump on the game. Anyways, it's a decent card, and I gave it five stars.

I finally decided to step out of the dark ages and upgraded from a "dumb phone" to a Verizon Samsung Galaxy S5 "smart phone". I had resisted that move for several years, thinking that my Verizon phone bill would increase by another $40-50 over the $105 which I was already paying for their base plan. Stopping by Verizon to troubleshoot a minor malfunction of my LG dumb phone, I asked how much an upgrade phone would cost me and was shocked to find out that my total phone bill would drop to $60 per month by switching to a smart phone. Wow. No brainer and took the plunge. Next I realized that the 16gb of onboard memory could be chewed up pretty fast with media, such as videos of family, photographs, and my extensive music library, so I searched for high capacity micro SD cards to install in the S5. Although the Sandisk was considered, I noted a number of negative reviews in which their card had flaws which had to be addressed by Sandisk's customer support (which by the way, appeared to be very proactive on Amazon, by addressing each 1 or 2 star review with a request for the reviewer to contact Sandisk support for a resolution to their problem...bravo to them for caring enough to monitor negative reviews). At any rate, there seems to be somewhat universal problems encountered with these higher capacity cards, depending upon what file format the Android devices run on (in their software)..i.e. FAT32 vs. exFat (which is on newer devices). Fat32 PC's and mobile devices will not recognize cards above 32gb. Many people running software with FAT32 have been advised to reformat the 32 and 64gb cards in their mobile device so that the device recognizes the card and can mount it successfully. So, not being a computer geek who understands the technical aspects of all this, I was a little bit hesitant, so I decided that if I have a Samsung S5 phone that the seemingly logical thing to do would be to purchase the Samsung 64gb card instead of the Sandisk. Makes sense that there should most likely be a higher degree of probable compatibility with the phone, being from the same manufacturer. Bottom line is that I inserted the Samsung 64gb Evo card into the S5, and it immediately recognized the card and also gave me a screen pop up indicating that any new pictures taken on the device would automatically default to storage on the card instead of storing on my phone's internal memory, which is exactly what I wanted to do. Then I fired up the camera and shot several pictures and each one showed the little SD card icon in the bottom left of my screen, indicating that the new shots went to the card for storage. Now all I need to do is to figure out how to move the shots I have already taken, from the S5 internal storage to the card. As a footnote, SD and microSD cards, and flash drives can definitely corrupt at a future date, because I have had it happen to me on 2 Sandisk flash drives, losing everything I had stored on them, so I highly recommend that you use Google+ for backup storage of media. It does not cost any extra and your device will send your media to Google for backup, automatically whenever you are powered up. Also be sure to go into Settings on your device and select the option to backup to Google, only when you are connected to WiFi (such as at home), so that the backup action does not eat into your data plan. I found out the hard way that backing up by "through the air" internet connection on my phone, without being connected to the internet by WiFi) quickly used (added) an initial 1.5 gig of data, for just 2 short videos and about 20 photos shot during the first weekend I had the phone, which backed up automatically, in the absence of "backup only when connected to WiFi". Hopefully this 64gb card will not corrupt in the future. Time will tell.

Ich habe eine 256 GB SD-Karte formatiert auf 64 GB erhalten, die nur Lese-/Schreibfehler produziert hat. Wurde problemlos von Amazon zurückgenommen

Good

Bought mine from seller Global Zone, been using it for 3 years, and still going strong. Back when I had the infamously hot running Samsung Galaxy 5 that destroyed an expensive Sandisk 64 GB and two other discount microSD cards, this was the only card that lasted without burning out from either the heat of the S5 (which ended up catching fire while charging one night) or the poorly designed SD mounting on same phone which caused the card to disconnect and disconnect continuously, leading a corrupted card. The card has been through three phones (the Galaxy, a HTC 8, and currently in my HTC 10). Its starting to show its age with the thousands of photos on my HTC 10 taking a few seconds to load on Photo Gallery sometimes, but its still a decent and very durable card.

Excelente tarjeta de memoria al mejor precio que he encontrado. A pesar de ser importada de USA me fué entregada en 6 dias por UPS, sin tener que pagar ni un centavo mas del precio publicado (los impuestos ya están incluidos y como compré 2 el envío fué gratis). Muy buena capacidad de almacenaje, de alrededor de 58gb libres, y excelente para teléfonos de gama alta y grabación a 1080p Full Hd. La probé con mi Samsung Galaxy Tab S y un Sony Z3 y funcionó de maravilla, hasta el momento no ha habido ningún problema con ningún archivo.

Produit, vendeur et livraison : RAS