






🔥 Step up your game with breathable, odor-free kicks that work as hard as you do!
The Bacca Bucci Men's Sneaker blends skin-friendly suede with a lightweight rubber sole featuring flex grooves for superior comfort and flexibility. Equipped with antimicrobial and anti-odor technology, these mid-top sneakers keep feet fresh and dry. Ideal for multi-purpose sports and casual wear, they offer a stylish, breathable, and durable option for professionals seeking both performance and fashion.
| ASIN | B085249145 |
| ASIN | B093LFXZQT |
| Brand | Bacca Bucci |
| Closure Type | Lace-Up |
| Color | Grey |
| Cushioning Level | Minimal |
| Customer Reviews | 3.6 3.6 out of 5 stars (6,254) |
| Customer reviews | 3.6 3.6 out of 5 stars (6,254) |
| Date First Available | 2 April 2019 |
| Department | Men |
| Heel Type | Flat |
| Insole Cushioning | Suede |
| Insole Material | Rubber |
| Item Weight | 0.8 Kilograms |
| Item model number | BBMH9004 |
| Manufacturer | Bacca Bucci Fashions Private Limited |
| Manufacturer Part Number | BBMH9004I-08N |
| Material Fabric | Suede |
| Model Name | Bacca Bucci® Men's Ultraforce Mid-top Athletic-inspired Retro Fashion Casual/Outdoor Sneakers for Men- Blue |
| Occasion Type | Wedding |
| Outer Material | Others |
| Pattern | solid |
| Seasons | Summer, Winter |
| Shoe Height Map | Mid Top |
| Shoe Type | Athletic Shoe |
| Sole Material | Rubber |
| Special Features | Breathable, Lightweight |
| Specific Uses For Product | Sports |
| Sport Type | Multi-purpose |
| Strap Type | Lace |
| Style Number | BBMH9004I-08N |
| Toe Style | Closed Toe |
| lining-description | Natural Rubber |
A**N
At ₹1250 product was very much great. Otherwise also a good product.
A**T
Shoes are very light and good, but there is shape issue with it
R**S
Good product
V**A
⭐☆☆☆☆ (1/5) — Very Disappointing Quality and Customer Support I am extremely disappointed with both the product quality and the after-sales service. I purchased these shoes less than a year ago and have worn them only around 6–7 times under normal conditions. Despite such minimal use, the shoes have already developed significant damage, which clearly points to poor material quality or a manufacturing defect rather than regular wear and tear. What is even more frustrating is the company’s response. My request for replacement was rejected solely because it fell outside their 30-day policy window. This policy feels completely unreasonable for a footwear brand. Customers do not wear new shoes continuously for 30 days just to test durability. A good pair of shoes should last much longer with occasional use, and the brand should stand behind its product quality beyond such a short timeframe. I shared photos as evidence, but instead of reviewing the issue based on actual condition and usage, the response was limited to quoting policy terms. This approach shows a lack of customer focus and accountability toward product quality. Overall, this experience has significantly reduced my trust in the brand. Based on the quality and the way my concern was handled, I would not recommend purchasing from them.
R**T
The quality of the product degraded. Earlier the quality was good
Trustpilot
3 days ago
3 weeks ago