Labels Unlimited

The product was not as advertised. Ad said it would run on WIN 7, but it will not run on 64 bit WIN 7. It declares that fact when the disk is inserted to install.However, Amazon was quick to respond and offered a full refund.

I love the labels unlimited program but need it to work with Windows 7. If anyone reading this has one that works with Windows 7, please contact me or put it on Amazon and I will buy it!!

I have been using Labels Unlimited for many years. It is a great program for doing just one thing.Now that I've started using Windows 7, I have found the program closes each time I try to open up a saved label file.With Windows 7 XP Mode, it installs and works fine though, so I can keep using it.

Labels Unlimited has not ben updated to operate under the current operating systems. "Labels Unlimied used to be the best ever label maker because the user could have both text and symbals that ap[plied to all labels and merged data. User to add new fields and applied them them anywhere the user wanted the data placed on the label. New label makers have preselected fields and modifications cannot be made.. .D. N.. Cuellar

I have used Labels Unlimited for at least 10 years but when I purchased a Windows7 system (64 Bit) the product would not run. The description of the new version said it would run on Windows7 but it did not.I chose to keep it because the cost to return made the return not worth the time and expense.

Advertised as runs on Window 7, but it does not. If you had a 32 bit system it would, but most Windows 7 systems are 64 bit, So it was a waste of money as all my computers are 64 bit systems.

This is a great program. It is unfortunate that will only work with a 32 bit computer. Luckily, I still have one. It will not work in a 64 bit computer.

I had an earlier version of this program,but it would not work on my new Win 7 64 bit system. So, I ordered the new ver 2.0, assuming that they had upgraded their program. Not to be. The advertised requirements were: Windows operating system. This is not correct. It only works on 32 bit systems.