Glenor Co 3.5mm Headphone Adapter

Recommend...

I am a 60 year old woman who is most pleased with my new "108-slot ring box!" I am a jeweler's granddaughter, and a lifelong, card-carrying, "ring freak," with a special angle towards vintage wedding bands, engagement rings, and vintage wedding sets. I have been collecting what appeals to me over the past 25 years or so, through various outlets, primarily online. They had outgrown the dresser space and smaller ring containers in which I had been keeping them, and had also outgrown the large, flat, older ring container (100 piece capacity) I had previously purchased several years ago, and when the "hinge" of the top began to separate completely from the bottom, I began shopping for a new ring box. I own other jewelry of course, but not in the same quantity or quality as my rings. As I began looking at the new ones for sale, I already knew I didn't want one of the same maker or design, as it has proved to be of lesser quality than I was now ready to purchase. One thing kept coming up though, and that was the Glenor Company name, and in several configurations. Their 108 piece capacity ring box kept popping up in my searches, along with their other configurations in different sizes and styles, to hold other types of pieces. After a few passes, and nothing else was coming up that seemed to suit my purpose, I decided to investigate more thoroughly. After getting more of the kind of information I had been looking for, and agreeing that the price was quite fair, I placed my order. Several days later, my jewelry box was delivered. The outer casing was a heavy cardboard box, but a good bit larger than the inner box used to hold the jewelry box, and I was immediately concerned that the contents had possibly suffered some kind of damage, since there was so much unfilled space around the inner carton. I discovered to my relief, on examining and opening the inner carton, that no damage had occured, as the contents were well protected with a variety of packing materials. After removing the jewelry box itself, I was immediately struck by how heavy it was, and how well-made it seemed to be. I examined it thoroughly, and became more and more impressed with its quality and attractiveness. The ring rolls, covered in a beige, dense, velvety, flocked material resembling short-napped velvet, were also thick, heavy, and individually dense themselves, but giving way just enough to pressure to allow insertion of multiple widths of rings and holding each snuggly. Even the wedding sets, whether two separate rings worn together, or two rings soldered together, which seems quite popular with wedding sets of the 30's through the 50's, (to keep them from turning in opposite directions on the finger) were easily, and firmly, captured between the rolls. There is enough room to insert nine (9) size seven (7) rings in each roll, and there are seven (7) rows in which rings can be held, for a total of 63 rings! That's quite a bonus of space for nine (9) more rings per tray. This gives the primary capacity of 126 rings, instead of "just" 108. Quite a bonus to be sure! Of course, your results may vary, given the size of the rings in your own collection. It makes me wonder 🤔what size ring they used to establish the original capacity rating. Surely larger than a seven, which is about an industry standard average for women's rings. Ah well, if you wear a smaller size, then it may hold more for you!😉 The top is beautiful, with a strong latch attached to it to fasten quickly and easily to its compatible catch on the bottom portion, through a stylish and effective magnetic and mechanical catch all in one. It also has full size mirror inside the top, allowing for quick checks of your jewelry selections, once you have them on. The top tray is easily removed with the use of two small ribbon loops, one at each side, or it sits up above the edge of the wooden box enough to allow grasping and removing the top in that manner. The bottom is identical in size and content to the top, allowing the storage of 63 more rings (for me, anyway!) if needed. I have doubled up many of my rings, as they come in sets, so I have considerably more than 63 rings in the top "shelf" and could do the same in the bottom section if I needed to. As it is, The bottom section is half full, with the majority of my best rings, bands and sets in the top section. Overall, I would have to say that this is a great quality choice for anyone who needs a high quality, attractive storage box for a large collection of rings. (Cufflinks could also be stored in this box if needed.) I would not hesitate to advise anyone with such a need to invest in this jewelry box. I am looking forward to having and using this jewelry box for many years.

I am pleased with the quality of this jewelry organizer. It looks attractive and is made well. I looked at other options and decided on an organizer that doesn't leave my items as visible as trays and that can be tucked away when needed. Especially as a renter, I may have contractors accessing my apartment on short notice. The lid is magnetic, so not something you want to turn upside down but when I am rushing to get ready for work, I can quickly open the lid to choose jewelry and it's easy to put jewelry away so it doesn't lie on the desk or dresser... or end up in the vacuum. Best option to let my jewelry collection "grow." Especially for the quality of this price range.

This ring box exceeded my expectations. I was tired of opening individual ring boxes to find what I wanted to wear. This box is very nice and sturdy. Holds the rings nicely in place. Perfect size (I ordered the bigger one). I really like it. All my rings are tucked away in a safe place altogether. A great purchase.

This replaced 2 ring holder boxes I had so that I can put them all in one place. I use one tray for my gold rings and the other for my silver ones. The slots that hold the rings became loose in my old ring holder which was very cheaply made. This one is sturdy, elegant, and worth the price, The slots that hold the rings are tight but easy to slide the rings into. I would highly recommend.